In a recent commentary, Andrew Neil argued that it’s time for the West to stop being swayed by Vladimir Putin’s threats and take a more decisive stance in supporting Ukraine. Neil emphasizes that Putin’s “blood-curdling threats” should no longer intimidate or influence Western actions, particularly when it comes to supplying Ukraine with the weapons and resources needed to defend itself.
According to Neil, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine is a pivotal moment for global stability, and backing down in the face of Putin’s rhetoric could embolden the Russian president further. He calls for stronger military and logistical support for Ukraine, stating that the West must send a clear message that it will not be cowed into submission.
In essence, Neil argues that the time for hesitation is over, and the focus should be on ensuring Ukraine has what it needs to continue its fight for sovereignty.
The chilling rhetoric from Vladimir Putin, warning that NATO and Russia would be at war if Ukraine were allowed to strike targets inside Russia with Western-supplied long-range missiles, is designed to sow fear and hesitation among NATO allies. Dmitry Medvedev’s bombastic claim that Britain would “sink” under a barrage of Russian hypersonic missiles further amplifies the threats, though many dismiss him as a sycophantic mouthpiece for Putin.
While Medvedev’s threats may be exaggerated, Putin’s nuclear arsenal and his track record of unpredictability and brutality cannot be ignored. His invasion of Ukraine was both unprovoked and ferocious, highlighting the extent to which he is willing to escalate tensions. Given these factors, it is crucial to recognize that such threats are aimed at dividing and intimidating Western nations from offering full support to Ukraine. However, as Andrew Neil and other commentators suggest, backing down could embolden Putin, whereas standing firm and providing Ukraine with the tools to defend itself might weaken his grip.
