Diddy’s recent arrest has drawn significant media attention, especially regarding a drastic move he made to secure the silence of celebrities surrounding the incident. Reports suggest that Diddy offered substantial financial incentives to keep high-profile friends and associates quiet about the circumstances leading to his arrest. This maneuver is believed to have aimed at protecting his reputation and minimizing the fallout from the arrest.
The situation has raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about the lengths to which celebrities might go to manage their public image and the potential implications of such actions. As details continue to unfold, the focus remains on how this will affect Diddy’s career and relationships within the entertainment industry.
A month before Diddy faced a scathing lawsuit from his ex-girlfriend Cassie, which led to criminal charges, he made headlines by surprising the music industry. Diddy announced he would return publishing rights to a number of artists under his Bad Boy label, a move that garnered widespread praise at the time.
However, rapper Mark Curry recently shared his perspective on this decision during an appearance on the Daily Mail’s podcast The Trial of Diddy. Curry suggested that there may have been more to the story than met the eye, implying that Diddy’s move could have been motivated by the impending legal troubles he was about to face. His insights provide a behind-the-scenes look at the dynamics within the music industry and raise questions about the timing of Diddy’s actions.
During his appearance on the Daily Mail podcast The Trial of Diddy, Mark Curry claimed that Diddy returned the publishing rights of various artists in exchange for non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to prevent them from discussing him. Curry suggested that Diddy likely anticipated the legal challenges that were on the horizon and sought to protect himself by covering his tracks.
Curry stated, “He gave all of the artists back their publishing rights in exchange for an NDA not to talk about him,” adding, “Tried to cover up his tracks real quick – it didn’t work.” This insight raises questions about Diddy’s motivations and the lengths he might go to safeguard his reputation amid mounting allegations.
In a recent episode of the Daily Mail podcast The Trial of Diddy, Mark Curry, alongside host Marjorie Hernandez, discussed Diddy’s legacy in the wake of his arrest. Curry reflected on his struggles even years after leaving Bad Boy Records, stating that he has not fully recovered either financially or emotionally.
Despite years of touring and writing hits for Diddy, Curry’s promised debut album never came to fruition. He revealed that the publishing rights to the songs he created under Bad Boy generated no income for him, as Diddy and the label retained the majority of the rights. Disillusioned by the experience, Curry chose to step away from his rap career, returning to Georgia, where he took up carpentry to make ends meet.
Curry has often referred to Diddy as the “devil,” indicating the lasting impact of their tumultuous professional relationship. In 2009, he authored a book titled Dancing with the Devil: How Puff Burned the Bad Boys of Hip-Hop, which detailed his experiences working with Combs.
He noted that his last conversation with Diddy occurred in September 2023, just a month before Cassie filed her bombshell lawsuit. During that time, Diddy surprised the music industry by returning publishing rights to original artists under Bad Boy, including Curry, Ma$e, Cam’ron, Faith Evans, The Lox, and 112, a move that has since raised eyebrows given the timing and context surrounding Diddy’s legal issues.
Mark Curry expressed skepticism about Diddy’s decision to return publishing rights to artists, suggesting that Diddy was aware of the impending legal troubles he faced. Curry claimed, “He gave all of the artists back their publishing rights in exchange for an NDA not to talk about him,” and added, “Tried to cover up his tracks real quick – it didn’t work.”
He compared the returned rights to getting back a Nissan Sentra that had significantly depreciated in value, saying it felt akin to receiving back someone he loved who had been mistreated: “I felt like he gave me back a female that I used to love that he abused and raped, took advantage of her, then gave her back to me.” Curry expressed his disdain for the gesture, stating that he got rid of the rights immediately after receiving them: “I don’t want it.”
When host Marjorie Hernandez asked if he had signed an NDA, Curry asserted, “(Diddy) can’t tell me not to do anything.” He referenced their initial contract, which promised support for his career, stating, “That didn’t work,” and indicated that he would not be bound by any further agreements. Curry emphasized his refusal to be dictated to, saying, “So since we’re going to be disrespectful, we’re going to be disrespectful all the way around the table. It just ain’t going to be you telling me and me listening.”
